Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 690 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 08:45:09 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 08:45:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 68301 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2003 08:44:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 68253 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2003 08:44:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 68224 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 08:44:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de) (193.109.238.66) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 08:44:40 -0000 Received: from z011104.bk.fin.local (z011104.bk.fin.local [193.109.238.140]) by dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8N8in5O023368 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:44:49 +0200 Received: by z011104.bk.fin.local with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:44:51 +0200 Message-ID: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B5608FF7011@Z011004> From: Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: RE: Ant 1.6 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:44:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C381AE.F2B051C0" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C381AE.F2B051C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I would like to release ant 1.6 beta on tuesday next week=20 > (September 30th). > Can you all have your changes ready by then ? >=20 > Really what I would prefer is that all changes which should=20 > go into both 1.6 > and HEAD get merged by the committer who does the change, so=20 > that I do not > have to do it myself. >=20 > I would like to have a serious look at 3 test cases which fail in my > environment Win2000/cygwin : > 1) ReplaceTest : failing because cygwin cvs checks out the=20 > files with a \n > separator, but the multiline replacement introduces \r\n (just in the > replaced part, the rest of the file stays unchanged). >=20 > 2) ModifiedSelectorTest : fails for me under cygwin, no idea yet why works on my machine (Win2K, JDK 1.4.1), so I haven=B4t any idea, = either. > 3) ConcatTest : I also have the problem I am searching ... Jan ------_=_NextPart_001_01C381AE.F2B051C0--