ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Cohen" <SCo...@sportvision.com>
Subject RE: Timestamp attribute processing
Date Tue, 02 Sep 2003 17:27:16 GMT
This is why I don't want to use it.  The starTeam API has a method to
make an OLEDate (which it requires) out of a java.util.Date, and that's
all I need.  All I'm saying is that Ant should do the parsing in java,
and only convert the result to an OLEDate right before it passes it to
the Starteam API.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_l@iseran.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: Timestamp attribute processing


Steve Cohen wrote:
...

> The StarTeam API uses something they call an OLEDate, which I'm sure 
> has some sort of parse capability but if I rely on that then I run the

> risk of being out of synch with the rest of Ant.

That looks suspiciously like a COM or SQL server datatype.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message