ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Dixon <...@dixons.org>
Subject RE: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
Date Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:45:30 GMT
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:

>  > >  >  > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <paston@bea.com> wrote:
>  > >  >  > > and would they like <batchtest fork="single"/>

This syntax seems better to me.

>  > > Patch and new file attached for consideration.

I suspect that the listserv dropped both.

>  > >                                                 Example usage:
>  > >     <junit fork="true">
>  > >       <batchtest singleProcess="false">

This syntax is less clear -- but I suppose that you didn't want to hassle
with changing setFork to accept any of a list of choices?

> Yes, a list of the tests is passed to the forked process through
> a temporary file.

And so all must share the same test options?

--
Jim Dixon  jdd@dixons.org   tel +44 117 982 0786  mobile +44 797 373 7881


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message