ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20578] - STCheckout - it would be nice to be able to check out against timestamps
Date Mon, 01 Sep 2003 19:48:26 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20578>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20578

STCheckout - it would be nice to be able to check out against timestamps





------- Additional Comments From scohen@apache.org  2003-09-01 19:48 -------
I disagree that checking out against a label before a successful compile is not
logical.  There are many uses for that functionality, for example, a version
that has built locally is labeled.  It is then submitted to QA.  Bugs are fixed,
but in the meantime, development has continued beyond this point.  Also,
StarTeam allows the label for a file to be "rolled forward" on an individual
file basis, meaning that if the original content of a view label had problems,
simply my manipulating the label-file association, the label may be made valid.  

Be that as it may, your use case has validity, and the StarTeam API supports it,
so I am going to try to implement it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message