Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71194 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 15:47:58 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2003 15:47:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 94798 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2003 15:43:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 94552 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2003 15:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 94348 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 15:43:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO junior.lgc.com) (134.132.72.99) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2003 15:43:50 -0000 Received: from lgchvw01.lgc.com (lgchvw01.lgc.com [134.132.93.107]) by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with SMTP id h7SFgXo15834 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:42:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 134.132.93.152 by lgchvw01.lgc.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:43:42 -0500 Received: by lgchexchbh.ad.lgc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:43:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dominique Devienne To: "'Ant Developers List'" Subject: RE: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:43:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org] > > I'd like to explore the needs that is driving this specific feature > request - and see whether there is a different way to meet it. > or will allow you to import a set of properties (or > property setting tasks) for example. I probably would not have needed if I had access to ... I feel it's a little hackish too, even though it serves my purpose just fine for now. The fact that ProjectComponent reference instances change Project when returned could have negative side effects for example??? > > Three +1s are required for a code change, so, by the likes of it, > > the vote will have a negative result. > > No, just no positive result. Sorry for dropping the ball on you ;-) I posted this code kinda showing off I guess, during the discussion if you recall, and also because it might be useful to somebody else. I looked at the Antelope one, and really didn't like the code duplication I saw there. So I hacked my own thanks to a loop hope related to the Introspection rules of Ant to get a hold of the nested private project... Would be cleaner in proper, but still not great. is the way to go forward I think. I'm just missing it with my 1.5.3 Ant used in production builds (augmented Ant, but not modified in any way). Thanks for proposing my code though. Cheers, --DD PS: Maybe Ant-Contrib would like to incorporate to compete on features with Antelope??? ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org