Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50031 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 07:15:34 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 07:15:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 5815 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2003 07:15:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 5767 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2003 07:15:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 5645 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2003 07:15:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de) (193.109.238.66) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2003 07:15:02 -0000 Received: from z011104.bk.fin.local (z011104.bk.fin.local [193.109.238.140]) by dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7T7F9g8020500 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:15:09 +0200 Received: by z011104.bk.fin.local with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:15:10 +0200 Message-ID: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B5608FF6E93@Z011004> From: Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: RE: Getting 1.6 out the door Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:15:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C36DFD.48138C60" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C36DFD.48138C60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable by Conor > What I'd suggest is that soon we branch 1.6 and remove anything that = is still=20 > settling down. I think we have a few ideas that need to be kicked = around=20 > before we feel comfortable with them. This work can continue on the = HEAD=20 >(1.7) while we prepare a release. +1 by Conor > Once we have 1.6 out there I would like to aim for a 1.7 release much sooner=20 > than was the case between 1.5 and 1.6. This would pick up those ideas which=20 > aren't solid today.=20 +1 because if some of the features are not elected for 1.6 by Conor > There will probably be a 1.6.1 release in between to=20 > clean up any issues we discover in 1.6 That=B4s usual :-) by Conor > 1. > 2. antlib > 3. and +0 I like the ideas, but I haven=B4t worked with them and there were = some points written I can=B4t refuse.=20 by Steve > Because ant is so often integrated into IDEs these days, stability is = > good for our customers. Yes. On the lists and forum there sometimes is asked for 1.4 and they = can=B4t change. by Steve > Also, we can only win one javaworld award a year, right? I think so ... are there any other awards? :-) by Steve > antlib > We could put it in the betas and see how it goes down; pull it if = there=20 >is trouble. Where is it documented, incidentally? If the "old" way works in the 1.6, too, we can introduce that. = Important is to know - where is the doc? :-) - in which order libs are loaded? (namespace collision) - is there a "default" namespace? (for the "old" libs) Ok, I haven=B4t worked with that ...=20 by Steve > including AntContrib-stuff I think there is more in AntContrib worth for including in Ant that=20 / . But what about license? We had discussion about that. If I remember right, there came nothing from the project administrator at sourceforge. But I can live with the state now. ant-contrib.jar is always in my %ant_home%/lib directory :-) It=B4s only nerve-killing always to = taskdef the tasks... Jan ------_=_NextPart_001_01C36DFD.48138C60--