Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 50734 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2003 18:59:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 50630 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2003 18:59:16 -0000 Received: from cujo.runbox.com (HELO aibo.runbox.com) (193.71.199.138) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2003 18:59:16 -0000 Received: from [10.9.9.1] (helo=pluto.runbox.com) by lufsen.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZxgO-000088-H2; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:59:20 +0200 Received: from [4.62.118.88] (helo=critterling.garfield.home) (Authenticated Sender=vjorlikowski@runbox.com) by pluto.runbox.com with asmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ZxgK-0002IX-KV; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:59:16 +0200 Received: (from critter@localhost) by critterling.garfield.home (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h68IxFh03025; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:59:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 14:59:15 -0400 From: "Victor J. Orlikowski" To: dev@ant.apache.org, bsf-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: [FWD] [GUMP] Build Failure - dist-ant Message-ID: <20030708145915.C2542@critterling.garfield.home> Mail-Followup-To: dev@ant.apache.org, bsf-dev@jakarta.apache.org References: <20030708101941.A800@critterling.garfield.home> <20030708142936.A2542@critterling.garfield.home> <20030708144700.B2542@critterling.garfield.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030708144700.B2542@critterling.garfield.home>; from victor.j.orlikowski@alumni.duke.edu on Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:47:00PM -0400 X-Sender: 230450 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:47:00PM -0400, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:29:36PM -0400, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: > > Ugh, quite right. Neither had the two-arg version. My mistake. > > > > OK, I'm perfectly amenable to putting back the 5-arg versions, and > > marking them as deprecated; your patch covers that, Stefan, though > > I may make minor changes (prolly not many). > > > > My intent was to bring the parameter lists back in line w/ those > > in 2.2; I'll do a quick bit of research to see what I missed, and > > put that back. > > > > Ugh. Replying to my own post. Ditto. Patch committed (with some minor indentation changes). The floor is open to anyone who wishes to make the case for the old parameter lists to not be deprecated. Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains! ================================================================= orlikowski@apache.org | victor.j.orlikowski@alumni.duke.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org