Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
From: Conor MacNeill <conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>
To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: New Laucher
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 23:00:37 +1000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <200306272140.24470.conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>
 <m38yriqwu7.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
In-Reply-To: <m38yriqwu7.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200307012300.37998.conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:02 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Conor MacNeill <conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>
>
> wrote:
> > Thoughts?
>
> The only thing I've stumbled over for now is the almost duplicate code
> of Locator#getClassLocationURL and
> oata.util.LoaderUtils#getClassSource - I'd like to see them merged in
> some way.
>

I wanted to keep the dependencies between Ant proper and the launcher to a 
minimum. To have the code available to the launcher, the only choice would be 
to move the code into the launcher.Locator and make use of it from there. I 
don't think the current code would be good candidate for that due to its 
coupling to FileUtils. The alternative candidate code (commented out) would 
be OK, although I'm a bit leery of the url.openConnection().

What do you think?

Conor


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org