Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 34774 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2003 11:39:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 34757 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2003 11:39:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gwaihir.fuegolabs.com) (200.80.200.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2003 11:39:16 -0000 Received: from fuegolabs.com (wintermute.fuegolabs.com [192.168.0.11]) by gwaihir.fuegolabs.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h5BBZIJ0009689 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 08:35:18 -0300 Message-ID: <3EE714D7.10007@fuegolabs.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 08:39:03 -0300 From: Mariano Benitez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-ar MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: adding success & failure to References: <747F247264ECE34CA60E323FEF0CCC0C0AF21C@london.cellectivity.com> <3EE7140B.1040709@fuegolabs.com> In-Reply-To: <3EE7140B.1040709@fuegolabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mariano Benitez wrote: > it is VERY java oriented to use try/catch to implement this, and I > would rather use the way it is implemented in the rest of the ant > tasks, like javadoc, junit, etc. > it is very simple also to change the value of haltonerror to > true/false, instead of ignoring a catch. > > Although I evaluated the try/catch solution, I still want this feature > to be included. > > Anyway, is there any philosophical objection why this should not be > included, does it go against some rule? just curious... > > > MAriano > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > >>This can be achieved with the task from antcontrib. >>Take a look at it. >> >>I think it is becoming time for some of this very useful and >>generic tasks to make its way into CORE. >> >>What do people think? What antcontrib people think? >> >>Jose Alberto >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Mariano Benitez [mailto:mariano@fuegolabs.com] >>>Sent: 11 June 2003 00:35 >>>To: Ant Developers List >>>Subject: Re: adding success & failure to >>> >>> >>>I completely desire that, for long nested builds for >>>regression testing >>>makes life really easy to just send a build to run, and if fails, no >>>problem, keep going to the next build. >>> >>>MAriano >>> >>>Steve Loughran wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I think I posted this last week, but it got lost >>>> >>>> >>>>1. What do people think about adding the ability to set >>>> >>>> >>>properties if >>> >>> >>>>a subant or ant call failed/succeeded. This lets me do >>>> >>>> >>>complex things >>> >>> >>>>in cruise control. >>>> >>>>2. How best to do it? >>>> >>>>Here is one example implementation >>>> >>>>>>> succeeded="driver.built" failoneerror="false"/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> succeeded="driver.tested" failoneerror="false"/> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>failoneerror="false"/> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>failoneerror="false"/> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org >>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org