Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 80873 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 08:19:12 -0000 Received: from smtprelay03.ilcampo.com (193.172.126.8) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2003 08:19:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 12824 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 08:19:23 -0000 Received: from linpulse.abz.privilcampo.net (HELO post1.atriserv.nl) (172.16.1.253) by smtprelay03.ilcampo.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2003 08:19:22 -0000 Received: by post1.atriserv.nl with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:19:21 +0200 Message-ID: From: Jene Jasper To: 'Ant Developers List' Subject: RE: Patch JavaCC - KEEP_LINE_COLUMN, JJTree - OUTPUT_FILE and new tas kdef JJDoc Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:19:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2F8F0.8FC5A750" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F8F0.8FC5A750 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >>On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jene Jasper wrote: >> As mentioned yesterday, I have made some changes to the JavaCC and >> JJTree taskdefs and added a new taskdef for JJDoc. I have included >> the patch.txt for the changes. But what is the best way to deliver >> the new files JJDoc.java and jjdoc.html ? >Create an enhancement request in Bugzilla, attach this patch and the >two new files. >Does your patch include the JavaCC 3.0/2.1 changes? I'd like to >tackle that separately if possible. We are thinking along the same line. That is why I created this separate patch. And about the patch for the JavaCC 3.0/2.1 changes, I have the following question: Does it make a difference if I make the patch on my latest revision or the snapshot of April 1st? I don't think it will involve the same lines of code. Jene. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F8F0.8FC5A750--