ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From peter reilly <peter.rei...@corvil.com>
Subject Re: Roles (was: antlib)
Date Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:21:03 GMT
On Tuesday 29 April 2003 16:50, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez
>
> <jalberto@cellectivity.com> wrote:
> > This continues with the two-tier issue, the core conditions of ANT
> > you can just named, but the third party ones need to use some funny
> > syntax.
>
> core conditions would use the same funny syntax, if it wasn't for
> backwards compatibility, that is.
>
> But then again this "funny syntax" for potentially highly dynamic
> things like the condition or linereader framework makes me back away
> from it.  I think it also is what made me argue against it about nine
> months back 8-)
>
> OK, so
+1
I will upload an implementation of my proposal to night. (minus the
adaptor stuff)

>
> <condition>
>   <outofdate>
>
> it is, with an addXYZ(Condition) method marking it up - I'm not really
> fond of any of the proposed naming conventions so far.

Whats wrong with add(Condition) ?

>
> We still need a solution for the ambiguos cases, though.
1.7+ ?

Peter


Mime
View raw message