ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent
Date Fri, 25 Apr 2003 06:50:23 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249

javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

bodewig@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|Major                       |Enhancement



------- Additional Comments From bodewig@apache.org  2003-04-25 06:50 -------
If you really already have all your packages listed in doclet.ins you are not
going to gain anything by using <javadoc> instead of <exec> - well, <javadoc>
doesn't need the javadoc executable in the PATH, but that's pretty much all.

You must give <javadoc> at leas one source file or package name to chew upon
as it really has been invented for a more dynamic system than yours.  This also
is a workaround for you, simply give it a single source file you will want to
have docced anyway.

You can pass your @doclet.ins via the additionalparam attribute.

Mime
View raw message