Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 8548 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 11:28:03 -0000 Received: from bodewig.bost.de (195.227.98.11) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 11:28:03 -0000 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h27BSGc06617; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:28:16 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@bost.de using -f To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.5.3? References: <200303072223.00764.conor@cortexebusiness.com.au> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 07 Mar 2003 12:28:16 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Military Intelligence) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill wrote: > There is also a junit version issue which we should address. I think this isn't real. > although only releases seem to bring issues out :-). Yes, unfortunately. 8-( If only Christopher had told us of the Cactus problem earlier ;-) > The question, I think, is how long do we wait to shake out any other > issues? Not too long. So far it is hard to recommend switching to 1.5.2. > Should we limit 1.5 branch changes to these fixes to avoid > introducing other issues? I think so. Stefan