Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 53891 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 08:17:30 -0000 Received: from bodewig.bost.de (195.227.98.11) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 08:17:30 -0000 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2D8Hfx17884; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:17:41 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@bost.de using -f To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.6 milestones ? References: From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 13 Mar 2003 09:17:41 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Military Intelligence) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: > Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 > milestone builds ? Ant has never released any milestone builds so far, so no, there is no plan yet AFAIK. If there was, you'd know it for sure 8-) Before we release a milestone we should make sure that whatever we release at least passes our tests (including the currently disabled ImportTest) and doesn't have any known regressions (see my mail of yesterday). And then I'd really love to have a rundown of the new features (I was swamped when you committed the parts coming from the embed proposal and lost track of it, a simple short list would suffice for starters) and look at them one by one to get consensus on whether we want them - if we can't agree on a given feature, it shouldn't be included in a milestone at all IMHO. Stefan