Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 85844 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2003 14:30:11 -0000 Received: from mail.impress.de (HELO nts-049dz-002.interne.impress.de) (195.127.16.3) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 14:30:11 -0000 Received: from 10.1.1.2 by nts-049dz-002.interne.impress.de (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:12 +0200 Received: by nts-049ha-002.interne.impress.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:12 +0200 Message-ID: <208C46AF9D86D31188FD006008298C4103C60FFF@nts-049ha-002.interne.impress.de> From: Christoph Wilhelms To: 'Ant Developers List' Subject: RE: Call for defaults.properties maintanance... Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Stefan and all! > > To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed > > elements should be listed in the defaults.properties > > Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or > utterly, totally deprected and removed task - the classes are still > there for people who may have used the API directly. > > I think there is nothing listed, that should be in the properties > files. The gory details: So I am glad, that I can rely upon the the actuality of the defaults.properties! Thanx! I am currently working on a taskdef/typedef wizard (for ANTidote of course) and I want to provide "in-the-classpath-findable" Tasks/Types in a list. I'll simply filter out all found abstact classes... ... and probably all Types/Tasks in "our" packages, but probably others have reused our package-structure for their additional classes...!?! Thoughts? Improvements? Greetings, Christoph