Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 24533 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 08:57:30 -0000 Received: from mail.impress.de (HELO nts-049dz-002.interne.impress.de) (195.127.16.3) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 08:57:30 -0000 Received: from 10.1.1.2 by nts-049dz-002.interne.impress.de (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 06 Mar 2003 09:57:41 +0100 Received: by nts-049ha-002.interne.impress.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:57:41 +0100 Message-ID: <208C46AF9D86D31188FD006008298C4103C60F8D@nts-049ha-002.interne.impress.de> From: Christoph Wilhelms To: 'Ant Developers List' Subject: RE: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:57:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > At this stage, I think it is appropriate for us to look at > > Ruper. Centipede is, at this stage, something to layer on > > top of Ant and should remain separate, IMHO. > > I agree that Centipede should remain separate and remain on > top of Ant. > I also think that Centiepde can become an Ant subproject in it's own > right, with committers that have access only to the eventual > "ant-centiepde" module. I support this idea! I see Centipede on the same level as Antidote! Supprojects additionally do not have anything to do with the Ant releases or release schedule and bugs/issues! Probably Centipede has to be incubated before ;). Should Ruper become a subproject, too? Gump should - IMHO - become an Ant SUBProject, too (Jakarta -> Ant) Thoughs? Greetings, Christoph