Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 66594 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 09:54:08 -0000 Received: from mta01.mail.au.uu.net (HELO mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au) (203.2.192.81) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 09:54:08 -0000 Received: from dublin ([63.60.235.2]) by mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20030313095418.CEAU5875.mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au@dublin> for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:54:18 +1100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Conor MacNeill To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: 1.6 milestones ? Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:01:08 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200303132101.08743.conor@cortexebusiness.com.au> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:50 am, Costin Manolache wrote: > Hi, > > Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone > builds ? > I'm not really sure what a milestone build means and, more importantly, what expectations it creates for stability of feature set. For 1.6 I think there a few things which have been started which have not been completed. 1. Have we settled on the interpretation of basedir in the imported fragments? 2. I have a test case which fails which I think should be addressed. It is currently disabled since it was blocking the reporting of the JSPC failures 3. A lot of the code has comments such as //EXPERIMENTAL. There is unused code. I think some review here would be good. I'm still nervous about the task and its ability to change the config of a running loader. I would like to close off the 1.5 branch beore we really start to polish 1.6. 1.5.2 was meant to do that but I think we may have rushed it a little. -- Conor MacNeill Blog: http://codefeed.com/blog/