ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: subant
Date Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:55:46 GMT

Dominique Devienne wrote, On 14/03/2003 15.50:
> I actually signed off <lsync>, not <subant>, technically, but in practice
> give both. Anything I submit to BugZilla is good for the taking, and I'll
> refrain to include my usual/automatic copyright notice in the future.

Yees! lsync is koooool :-)

> Sorry to hear you suppressed passing down the current target name... That
> one of the feature of that task I won't live without. But that's OK, I'll
> keep using my own task then (actually I would anyhow for the dependency
> ordering I have).

Centipede does it using the Gump project descriptor. Could it be a wise 
thing to stick to one version of the two only, or does it make sense to 
have this anyway? (just asking)

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

View raw message