From conor@cortexebusiness.com.au Fri Feb 28 21:25:52 2003 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 18809 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 21:25:52 -0000 Received: from mta09.mail.au.uu.net (HELO mta09.mail.mel.aone.net.au) (203.2.192.90) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 21:25:52 -0000 Received: from cortexebusiness.com.au ([63.60.235.3]) by mta09.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20030228212556.QCEV3022.mta09.mail.mel.aone.net.au@cortexebusiness.com.au> for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 08:25:56 +1100 Message-ID: <3E5FD4FE.1060506@cortexebusiness.com.au> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 08:30:38 +1100 From: Conor MacNeill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en-au MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.2 Ready for Distribution References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sean P. Kane wrote: > Understood. Is there any path to take to try and encourage it's > inclusion in the 1.6 release without driving anyone crazy (non-annoying > persistance)? > non-annoying persistence is OK. You can vote on the bug in BugZilla - I do look at the votes to see how many people bugs/enhancements are affecting. It's not the only criterion, of course. For the past few weeks, I have been focussing on bugs to try and get as many bugs cleared up for the 1.5.2 release. My intention is now to address the enhancements and bugs more evenly for the 1.6 release. Eventually someone will get to it. Conor