ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Loughran" <stev...@iseran.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does not need to setSecurityManager
Date Wed, 12 Feb 2003 17:37:36 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stu Halloway (DevelopMentor)" <stu@develop.com>
To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 22:06
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Main.runBuild does not need to setSecurityManager


> >>I found this problem while testing PermissionSniffer [1], which is a
> >>prototype interactive SecurityManager. Sniffing out defects was an
> >>unexpected side effect.
> >
> >
> > hey, can you do Axis next? Or are you going to give us an <audit> ant
task
> > to include in the Gump?
> >
>
> Well, I have added an audit task to PermissionSniffer [1], but I don't
> know if it's what you had in mind. Take a look and let me know what
> other features you would like to see.
>
> I am writing an Axis lab for the class I am teaching next week and will
> take a pass with PermissionSniffer while I am at it.

ok.

>
> I haven't spent any time with the Gump yet, does my task need to do
> anything special to be Gump-friendly?

not usually


Mime
View raw message