Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-ID: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B5603CCC1F4@Z011004>
From: Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de
To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: AW: Ant API docs?
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:34:28 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2C619.944E32B0"

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C619.944E32B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Maybe that hint on that page would make much much clearer.
Or both :-) Nightly build and last official release.

(I for myself look only into my local doc. Maybe the nighly build of =
the
last night.)


Jan Mat=E8rne

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christoph Wilhelms [mailto:Christoph.Wilhelms@impress.com]
Gesendet am: Montag, 27. Januar 2003 16:30
An: 'Ant Developers List'
Betreff: RE: Ant API docs?

> My point was that this link error is known about, and=20
> purposefully left
> broken ;-) At least it's how I interpret what I have been=20
> told in the past.
>=20
> --DD

At least it is not even a link-error! The message is quite clear: "The
Ant-API has not been generated!" And that's the way it is! Which =
Ant-API
would YOU deploy there? The API of the latest nightly - would make =
sense for
developers? The API of the last official release - would make most =
sense for
users?

In a downloaded distribution you find the API behind the link - and =
this is
most important!

IIRC Dominiques and others remarks have been answered similarly - and =
have
not been ignored. What do the others think?

Cheers,
Chris

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   =
<mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: =
<mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C619.944E32B0--