Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 45099 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 20:57:12 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 20:57:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 14353 invoked by uid 97); 30 Jan 2003 20:58:42 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 14346 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 20:58:41 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 20:58:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 44833 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2003 20:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 44822 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 20:57:08 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 20:57:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 14340 invoked by uid 50); 30 Jan 2003 20:58:38 -0000 Date: 30 Jan 2003 20:58:38 -0000 Message-ID: <20030130205838.14339.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16611] - ant is confused when os.name returns "Windows Server 2003" and tries to exec "command.com" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16611 ant is confused when os.name returns "Windows Server 2003" and tries to exec "command.com" ------- Additional Comments From stevel@apache.org 2003-01-30 20:58 ------- the short term hack is as you suggest. The smarter approach would be to fallback to command.com, or better yet, probe for it somehow (which will be hard, until we can get at the environment). you know if all the JVMs re-enabled getenv() life would be much simpler :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org