Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 79152 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 17:50:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 17:50:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 28824 invoked by uid 97); 13 Dec 2002 17:51:09 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28762 invoked by uid 97); 13 Dec 2002 17:51:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28736 invoked by uid 98); 13 Dec 2002 17:51:05 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Costin Manolache Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant ProjectHelper.java Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:43:25 -0800 Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <20021213005218.49042.qmail@icarus.apache.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.84.39.162 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039801772 10197 64.84.39.162 (13 Dec 2002 17:49:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:49:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1 Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > >> Give me few more days at least. > > Did I say go back and revert it? I was just voicing my preference, > that's all. I know. If any problem happen - I'll revert it ( you don't have to say that ). I know it is a very significant change - all tasks and types are now wrapped in UnknwonElement and created just before execution. > ant-dev can be a much friendlier than a couple of other lists you are > subscribed to 8-) :-) >> For the next release - I think the new parser should be default >> ( assuming we don't find any major problem ), > > What could happen was that people did things like > > > > > we need more than a little note in the manual to get around this > problem. Are you talking about the little note in the XML spec, or every XML/XSL/SOAP manual written in the last 3 years ? If people didn't read the note about the use of ":" in namespace, the sooner they hear about it - the better it is for everyone :-) I'm not worried about that - but about tasks that rely on beeing created when the project is parsed, or do tricky things in the project. That's usually advanced stuff - and probably easy to fix ( and I'm sure people who do this kind of tricks have enough knowledge to fix ). Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: