Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 18001 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 18:07:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 18:07:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 24201 invoked by uid 97); 10 Dec 2002 18:08:37 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 24183 invoked by uid 97); 10 Dec 2002 18:08:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 24171 invoked by uid 98); 10 Dec 2002 18:08:36 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) Sensitivity: Subject: Re: JUNIT RUN To: "Ant Developers List" From: ahasham@triversity.com Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:03:26 -0500 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on trimax01/Trimax(Release 5.0.9a |January 7, 2002) at 12/10/2002 01:03:27 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thank you Stephane. Are these Tools available for free? Don't you think ANT JUNIT Tasks extend such functionality to support the report stating the number of classes that were run against the number of classes that were left out? Do you think it will be wise decision if I can re-extend Report for JUNIT Tasks to have more information? Abbas. "Stephane Bailliez" on 12/10/2002 12:57:04 PM Please respond to "Ant Developers List" To: "Ant Developers List" cc: Subject: Re: JUNIT RUN ----- Original Message ----- From: > I want to find out if there are anyway to know how many classes were tested > for > running JUNIT. Is there anyway to find out how many classes were run and > how > many classes were left out? > > Your guidance and answer will be highly appreciated. Use a coverage tool like JProbe, Clover, etc... A usual coverage tool usually report the number against the number of classes that were loaded by the VM (ie classes that were at least used once). This of course more than often give you the wrong numbers as you never know which class you leave out during the testing process. With the JCovReport Ant task you are able to have the classes left out as it will post process the results against a given set of reference classes, thus if you do your units tests and use as a reference all the classes of your application, you will know exactly how much of your application you are testing. Caveat. This task works only with JProbe 3.0 and not 4.0. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: