----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominique Devienne" <DDevienne@lgc.com>
> [DD] I like this abstraction. But would it work with a mapper that
returned
> several files to check dirty status given the proposed single object
> signtature?
Good point. But since the parameter is of type Object,
that *can* potentially even take in arrays. IOW, the
current signature does not prevent one from passing in
an array as argument. Agreed, it is not neat enough.
> [DD] I don't like that name personally. TargetObject seems designed
> exclusively for SourceFileScanner, and thus should relate to it by name.
> Something like SourceFileItem?
This should not apply to files alone; The Target may be anything,
not necessarily a File, though in this case, it happens to be.
Item is pedantic.
Cheers,
Magesh
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|