Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98013 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 09:29:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 09:29:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 4999 invoked by uid 97); 15 Oct 2002 09:30:50 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4976 invoked by uid 97); 15 Oct 2002 09:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4955 invoked by uid 50); 15 Oct 2002 09:30:48 -0000 Date: 15 Oct 2002 09:30:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20021015093048.4954.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13632] - condition fails to set property that has previously been set X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13632 condition fails to set property that has previously been set ------- Additional Comments From jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com 2002-10-15 09:30 ------- It was a "bug" that it worked in previous versions and it only worked in certain tricky ways. There are very good reasons why property immutability is a Good Thing. You might want to reconsider how you're implementing your build file. There are ways around this by using (which is an isolated new Ant "stack" that can have its own properties without affecting the calling Ant). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: