Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 5549 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 13:48:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2002 13:48:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 28181 invoked by uid 97); 24 Sep 2002 13:48:49 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28108 invoked by uid 97); 24 Sep 2002 13:48:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28093 invoked by uid 98); 24 Sep 2002 13:48:47 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Costin Manolache Subject: Re: [embed] Standalone release ? Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 06:47:07 -0700 Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <200209242102.07277.peter@apache.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12-234-177-242.client.attbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032875275 29460 12.234.177.242 (24 Sep 2002 13:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:47:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1 Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Peter Donald wrote: >> My primary goal is to have a number of features and code adopted >> for the next release of ant. A secondary goal is to have all those >> features available to ant1.5, so people can use them right away. > > Well I am fairly opposed to some of the features you have added and I > don't see them as improvements. I think the best strategy for you to get > something released is to move the code to commons and do a release or two > there. Then you can try to repropose (or not) the features into ant. Well, right now embed is an ant proposal and I see no reason to change that. Each feature will be proposed to a (majority) vote, when I feel it is ready - and if it is accepted I'll move it to head, if not I'll either drop it or continue to work on it as a proposal and address eventual concerns. > It would also be to your advantage to get gump builds working for your > fork. I had myrmidon builds going in parrallel to the main gump build and > then did a diff on the the "scorecard" to see the differences between > myrmidon and main ant tree. The infrastructure is all in gump and I am > sure that Sam/Stefan would be happy to have embed running on at least one > of the boxes each night. I have gump working ( on my own system ), and so far there are no differences. I'll check with Sam about adding them to one of the boxes after I find a clean way to do it ( right now I hacked some files ). Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: