Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 71476 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 19:37:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 19:37:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 9545 invoked by uid 97); 14 Aug 2002 19:37:41 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9514 invoked by uid 97); 14 Aug 2002 19:37:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9481 invoked by uid 98); 14 Aug 2002 19:37:40 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: costinm.sfo.covalent.net: costin owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:33:36 -0700 (PDT) From: costinm@covalent.net X-X-Sender: costin@costinm.sfo.covalent.net To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant In-Reply-To: <019f01c243c4$dc50d090$1219570f@ranier> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Steve Loughran wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Does someone know the problem here ? I haven't follow the latest > > > discussion > > > > about jspc. > > > > > > > > I'll try to add some stack traces in jasper. It's most likely a problem > > with the classpath - and doesn't find the compiler ( tools.jar ). > > a '1' error means that java isnt getting as far as running jasper, I think. If you look at the stack trace, it seems jasper is called, it translates the file, then calls ant - which exits with 1. There is a problem with displaying the messages, jasper is capturing the output so it can parse the error and determine the line numbers. > So the current algorithm is name -> name_jsp.java, with mutation of > non-classname things. > > And this is aligned with what tomcat4.1 expects inside, so can be used for > precompilation, right? Yes. Make sure you also generate the web.xml fragment - it's the safest ( and faster - you avoid JspServlet ). What I use is: Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: