Costin Manolache wrote: > I didn't know about DynamicConfigurator. I have many classes where > setAttribute() pattern is used - maybe I can enhance it a bit to > actually use introspection and not require the actual interface ? > ( i.e. if setAttribute()/createElement() method is found, use it ). > For the main branch at least. But what if I want an attribute literally called 'attribute' or an element called 'element'? How is what you're proposing an enhancement to this? Erik -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: