Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 27718 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 23:34:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 23:34:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 29580 invoked by uid 97); 15 Jul 2002 23:34:26 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29564 invoked by uid 97); 15 Jul 2002 23:34:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29552 invoked by uid 98); 15 Jul 2002 23:34:25 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: costinm.sfo.covalent.net: costin owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT) From: costinm@covalent.net X-X-Sender: costin@costinm.sfo.covalent.net To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: My itches for 1.6 In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020716092550.01cadf00@www.stocksoftware.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > > > At 01:46 PM 7/15/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > > >- the webapp class loader that can use Manifest entries to find > > > >and resolve dependencies, as well as allow 'webapps' to override some > > > >classes ( as required by the servlet2.3 spec - but that can be used > > > >in ant as well). > > > > > > > > > It has been used in myrmidon for about a year now and works relativly > > well. > > > It is only going to improve as time goes on as more specs (EJB, servlet, > > > JDK1.6, services etc) start requiring its support. > > > >Does it mean you are +1 on adding it to ant 1.6 ? > >Or you have some tasks that would brake :-) ? > > > Tasks would break thus I would block it ;) You'll have to find them first, and eventually find a second commiter to -1 it. Given that this processing can be enabled by an explicit user action and disabled by default - I don't think it would be very easy to find the breaking tasks ( at least not in the current Gump build ). Costin > > > Same for the loader hierarchy. > > same again. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: