Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 55224 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2002 22:29:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2002 22:29:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 14495 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jul 2002 22:30:03 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14479 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jul 2002 22:30:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14460 invoked by uid 98); 22 Jul 2002 22:30:02 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <20020722222945.15263.qmail@web13401.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:29:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Diane Holt Subject: Re: Problems with To: Ant Developers List In-Reply-To: <3D3C7130.87F2C912@olin.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- "Patrick (Gus) Heck" wrote: > So as I said before, i am for top level tasks with enforced ordering > with targets comming after all initializers if that is possible. I don't agree. When I'm cooking something up to provide a solution for something asked for on ant-user, I often put the task(s) specific to that directly above the for it. I not only don't find it confusing -- I do it on purpose. Diane ===== (holtdl@yahoo.com) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: