Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 46116 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2002 22:15:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2002 22:15:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20998 invoked by uid 97); 12 Jul 2002 22:16:15 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20953 invoked by uid 97); 12 Jul 2002 22:16:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20940 invoked by uid 50); 12 Jul 2002 22:16:14 -0000 Date: 12 Jul 2002 22:16:14 -0000 Message-ID: <20020712221614.20938.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7568] - Style task cannot specify processor parameters X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7568 Style task cannot specify processor parameters ------- Additional Comments From ddevienne@lgc.com 2002-07-12 22:16 ------- Wasn't the feature specified as: more natural? I thought the previous patch did it that way? --DD -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: