Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 18009 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2002 07:21:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2002 07:21:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 27910 invoked by uid 97); 20 Jun 2002 07:21:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27881 invoked by uid 97); 20 Jun 2002 07:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27869 invoked by uid 98); 20 Jun 2002 07:21:50 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <208C46AF9D86D31188FD006008298C4102AE8E45@nts-049ha-002.interne.impress.de> From: Christoph Wilhelms To: 'Ant Developers List' Subject: RE: Reactivating Antidote Project! Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:21:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Craig, Welcome back :-)! > As was stated in previous list items, I have quite a bit of > code (1.8Mb) > that is different than the CVS repository. I would like to > submit them > for patching, but am not too certain of the procedure for such a large > submission. I would appreciate a point in the right > direction, so that > more than a few of us can take a look at what has been done. I'd -1 to apply a patch as big as this - not only because I know how "bold" your version of Antidote has become. Mi goal ist to keep Antidote neat, clean, "kind of" small and in front of all: FAST! The Version in the cvs is not as comfortable as what you have done to it, but you already agreed that it is not as fas anymore... I think we should go the next steps carefully and incremental! I do not want to spoil the original design (speking of the code) bit improve funktionallity and useability! Again: Let's go step by step using the effort of a community which, hopefully, will be bigger then just us 3 (Armand, you and me). Cheers, Chris -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: