Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 91897 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 15:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2002 15:51:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 4942 invoked by uid 97); 13 May 2002 15:51:18 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4926 invoked by uid 97); 13 May 2002 15:51:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4914 invoked by uid 98); 13 May 2002 15:51:17 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Bug 5662 References: <3CDF1F6D.5050000@cortexebusiness.com.au> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 13 May 2002 17:51:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3CDF1F6D.5050000@cortexebusiness.com.au> Message-ID: Lines: 31 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 13 May 2002, Conor MacNeill wrote: >> (A) Always pass user-properties down as normal properties, that way >> inheritall doesn't make any difference and nested elements can >> override user properties. > I think this is the best solution. > My reasoning is that is the build file writer wants to make the > params passed to a sub-build overridable, that can be achieved by > justing using a property value in the subbuild param. I was thinking about magic properties here. would cause more than just a few problems in a well-known context. >> (C) Invent yet another type of property. > > I'd have to say that this just "smells" in the Martin Fowler sense. It sure does, but I think it just points out that our property system as we are using it today is at least a bit broken. Probably overloaded by too many concerns that have been pulling on it in different directions. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: