ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Magesh Umasankar" <umag...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Annoncement text for 1.5beta1
Date Thu, 02 May 2002 19:55:08 GMT
I don't think we are referring to any
external public static constants in the
relevant tasks - so I would be tempted to say
"No worries", but anyway, it is always nice
to be cautious ;-)

Cheers,
Magesh

**********************************************
*  Philosopher: A fool who torments himself  *
*  during life, to be spoken of when dead.   *
**********************************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Skeet" <jon.skeet@peramon.com>
To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: Annoncement text for 1.5beta1


> >However, you shouldn't compile against the created dummies for
> >actual binaries - the constants compiled into the classes may
> >well be wrong. This is more to make sure that the classes
> >*can* compile than for the classes themselves.
>
> Better than nothing ;)

I'm not so sure about that - what if Ant ends up using the compile-time
constant for DELETE instead of GET in something, for instance?

Jon

PS I think I do actually give the correct constant when I can, but I can't
guarantee anything.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message