ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Magesh Umasankar" <>
Subject Re: Annoncement text for 1.5beta1
Date Thu, 02 May 2002 19:55:08 GMT
I don't think we are referring to any
external public static constants in the
relevant tasks - so I would be tempted to say
"No worries", but anyway, it is always nice
to be cautious ;-)


*  Philosopher: A fool who torments himself  *
*  during life, to be spoken of when dead.   *
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Skeet" <>
To: "Ant Developers List" <>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: Annoncement text for 1.5beta1

> >However, you shouldn't compile against the created dummies for
> >actual binaries - the constants compiled into the classes may
> >well be wrong. This is more to make sure that the classes
> >*can* compile than for the classes themselves.
> Better than nothing ;)

I'm not so sure about that - what if Ant ends up using the compile-time
constant for DELETE instead of GET in something, for instance?


PS I think I do actually give the correct constant when I can, but I can't
guarantee anything.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message