Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 32292 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2002 04:19:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2002 04:19:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 20801 invoked by uid 97); 16 Apr 2002 04:19:40 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20785 invoked by uid 97); 16 Apr 2002 04:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20774 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2002 04:19:39 -0000 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: XMLValidate etc MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build M12_02042002 Pre-release 1 February 04, 2002 From: dion@multitask.com.au Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:28:48 +1000 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on gateway/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 04/16/2002 02:28:52 PM, Serialize complete at 04/16/2002 02:28:52 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm happy to help with this... -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers --------------Forwarded MSG-------- To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: new bug w/ xmlvalidate ----- Original Message ----- From: "Magesh Umasankar" > The reason for trying to wrap up on ERs by Apr 30 > is to have a cycle to just detect bugs that have been > introduced as a result of adding new features. > It would be ideal if you are able to complete > the enhancement before Apr 30th. But in case it > slips, please ensure you give a good amount of > time for it to live in 'Beta-1' state. I completely understand the reason for the cutoff dates, and I'm a big +1 for them! I appreciate you being heavy-handed with them too! :) > > Anyone disagree with this floating past Apr. 30? > > -0 to work on this enhancement past Apr 30 to make it > into Ant 1.5. What is the severity of the risk involved > in shipping it as-is, if need be? No severity risk at all really, it just is inconsistent and makes dealing with XML DTD/Schema clunky - with manual effort to pull DTD's out of JAR files for some tasks to do local resolution. I'll do my best to get it in - but certainly could use help with it. dIon? Conor? Anyone else on board? Erik -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: