Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-ID: <9B3E950CB293D411ADF4009027B0A4D202E218D5@PARSV011>
From: Stephane Bailliez <stephane.bailliez@haht.com>
To: Ant Developers List <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdef
	s Exit.java Filter.java FixCRLF.java GenerateKey.java Get.java Jar.java
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:47:39 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1252"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magesh Umasankar [mailto:umagesh@apache.org]
> 
>
> 
> Which is more important - performance or 80 characters at most per
> line?
> 
> I think we should go with private static final Strings in cases
> like above and allow them exceed the 80 character limit so as to
> get maximum performance.
> 
> I would like us to stick to 80 chars per line only if it
> is not going to adversely impact runtime performance.
> 
> Do you agree?

No.

1) we are talking about an exceptional situation which is unlikely to happen
so performance is not an issue.
2) the static strings will be concatenated at compile time as there is no
variables here. check the bytecode with javap

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>