Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 39600 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 00:37:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 00:37:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 6323 invoked by uid 97); 24 Apr 2002 00:37:55 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6306 invoked by uid 97); 24 Apr 2002 00:37:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6295 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 00:37:54 -0000 Message-ID: <3CC5FE61.2010905@chalko.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:37:53 -0700 From: Nick Chalko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8429] - Super-class SQLTask with an abstract JDBCTask. References: <20020423231747.3290.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N bugzilla@apache.org wrote: >DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG >RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT >. >ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND >INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8429 > >Super-class SQLTask with an abstract JDBCTask. > > > > > >------- Additional Comments From jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com 2002-04-23 23:17 ------- >I'm not comfortable applying this change if it requires a change to the the >test case. That means its breaking some level of API compatibility. Please re- >work your change such that the test case runs as it was before and then it can >be applied. Sorry - just too risky. If another committer wants to jump in and >apply thats fine - I just don't feel comfortable with it. > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >For additional commands, e-mail: > Let me look at again. I think you original error may have been a Static compile issue, build clean may take care of it. Let me check. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: