Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 91746 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2002 16:36:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2002 16:36:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 29102 invoked by uid 97); 22 Mar 2002 16:36:46 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29084 invoked by uid 97); 22 Mar 2002 16:36:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29069 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2002 16:36:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: stephan beal To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: Backwards incompatible change to Javac Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:36:42 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20020322162929.43552.qmail@web13407.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020322162929.43552.qmail@web13407.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Friday 22 March 2002 17:29 pm, Diane Holt wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Conor MacNeill wrote: > > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >> The only solution I can see: change fork back to boolean and add a > > >> new attribute for the forked executable. > > > > > > +1 > > > > OK, unless anybody objects, I'll make that change next week. > > Now that has a 'compiler' attribute, couldn't you allow that to > take a full path to the compiler when fork="yes"? That sounds very reasonable, as long as the full path isn't required to still run it (we then may need the ant equivalent of 'which javac', which would be more cross-system friendly than using a property to set the full path). i have to use fork for our builds to avoid OutOfMemoryExceptions, but javac is in a different place on each build machine, and i'd sure hate to have to futz with that in a properties file on each machine. ----- stephan Generic Universal Computer Guy stephan@einsurance.de - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 Student: "Master, you must teach me the way of liberation!" Master: "Tell me who it is that binds you." Student: "No one binds me!" Master: "Then why do you seek liberation?" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: