Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 36099 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2002 12:41:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2002 12:41:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 12200 invoked by uid 97); 7 Mar 2002 12:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 12184 invoked by uid 97); 7 Mar 2002 12:41:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 12173 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2002 12:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020307124101.80364.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:41:01 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jose=20Alberto=20Fernandez?= Subject: RE: Saxon Liason for Style task To: Ant Developers List In-Reply-To: <9B3E950CB293D411ADF4009027B0A4D202D3770B@maileu.imediation.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- Stephane Bailliez wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org] > > > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Jose Alberto Fernandez > > > wrote: > > > > > Has anyone written a Saxon specific XSLTLiason > for the > > > Style task? > > > > Doesn't Saxon implement TraX? Oh, I see Saxon 7 > does, but 6.5.1 does > > not. > > From what I understand he is using Saxon extensions > and he would like to be > able to use in the same place saxon and xalan for > example. So you cannot > rely on trax as you don't even know which one will > be use... (yeah right, > classpath) so you would need to specify the factory > to use for trax so that > you can call in one line saxon and on the other > xalan. > > But of course all this also depends on the JAXP > implementation you use for > trax since the first jaxp 1.1 (but not 1.1.1+) is > caching the factories and > is not loading them from the context classloader as > well AFAIR. > Well, the escence of my proposal is to be able to specify which TraX we want. The mechanics of how to obtain it, we probably need to think some more about it. I really do not know JAXP that well, so I just tried with something simple. For the JAXP experts, can I just do new of the class directly and just use that instead of what JAXP would have returned? If that works, we do not need to change the System.property, we just bypass all that. Ideas? Jose Alberto __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: