Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 23918 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 14:10:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2002 14:10:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 18627 invoked by uid 97); 2 Mar 2002 14:10:26 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18610 invoked by uid 97); 2 Mar 2002 14:10:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18599 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 14:10:25 -0000 Message-ID: <032601c1c1f3$09c5b490$0100a8c0@jose> From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" To: "Ant Developers List" References: Subject: Re: ClassLoaders ( was: Re: We need to stop the lies) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 12:45:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N How does Mutant implement ? Is it consider part of the core or not? I guess this is the point where I always have dificulty with proposals on having different syntax for project files. How does the task knows what syntax to parse? Jose Alberto ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Conor MacNeill" To: "Ant Developers List" Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 4:51 AM Subject: RE: ClassLoaders ( was: Re: We need to stop the lies) > From: Peter Donald [mailto:peter@apache.org] >=20 > Costin has proposed changes to ProjectHelper that are mostly=20 > equivelent to=20 > the ProjectBuilder abstraction I proposed. Basically a mechanism=20 > to to have=20 > alternative strategys to build project objects. At one stage you=20 > objected to=20 > ProjectBuilder abstraction back ages ago. Though from your=20 > comments recently=20 > I don't think your objections still hold ? >=20 OK, I see what you are getting at. In mutant the core doesn't really = care how project models are constructed. What interests the core is the = model itself. The core expects to be given the model from the front-end = code. How the front end built the model is not really relevant to how = the core processes the model. Since the core never requests "building" = of the project model, there is currently no need for the abstraction in = mutant. How do you use the abstraction in myrmidon? Conor -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: = For additional commands, e-mail: = -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: