DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7482>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7482
PatternSet.setIncludes() does not SET includes, but appends them to a list
jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com 2002-03-26 13:39 -------
Now do you understand why I feel uncomfortable re-using "tasks" internally? :)
I'm marking this as WONTFIX as its by design. Its for the case where you have
a nested <include> and use the 'includes' attribute - so it *must* be this way.
Refactor!
But more importantly, perhaps discuss your needs on ant-user or ant-dev on what
you're doing that can't already be done.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|