Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 84792 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 15:18:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 15:18:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 13567 invoked by uid 97); 28 Feb 2002 15:17:57 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13540 invoked by uid 97); 28 Feb 2002 15:17:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13509 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 15:17:56 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Ids from paths not propogated through antcalls unless path is top-level References: <20020224140240.65846.qmail@apache.org> <00b501c1bd40$5cd0f800$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0> <001501c1bd44$76d1c7d0$6601a8c0@darden.virginia.edu> <00d301c1bd49$b157ad20$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0> <007001c1bd61$7c8fc9c0$1502a8c0@Stelvio> <3C7952F2.4020908@exis.com> <017b01c1bda7$49d4b770$1502a8c0@Stelvio> <3C7A6F9B.2010106@exis.com> <3C7D47CD.9000408@exis.com> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 28 Feb 2002 16:17:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3C7D47CD.9000408@exis.com> Message-ID: Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > I very of do use > > ant A B C D > where A,B,C are only there to set things up, and D is the one the > does the 'real' work. Any reason why is not feasible? Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: