Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 89425 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2002 08:49:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2002 08:49:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 3248 invoked by uid 97); 27 Feb 2002 08:49:13 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3232 invoked by uid 97); 27 Feb 2002 08:49:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3221 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2002 08:49:12 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: cullers References: <001201c1bf5b$06605430$0100a8c0@jose> <200202270837.g1R8btN29318@mail008.syd.optusnet.com.au> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: 27 Feb 2002 09:34:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200202270837.g1R8btN29318@mail008.syd.optusnet.com.au> Message-ID: Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > * FileSet is a set of existing files, agreed. If we want to extend it to a more general set, that is fine with me, but we'll have to rewrite lots of tasks as they rely on the "existing" bit above. > Currently mappers transformation abilities are stricted to the name > attribute of the file - and this will likely remain the case with > you about ;) Oh, just convince me. 8-) > Hence we end up having extensions of Fileset to apply transformation > rather than a nested element. ie the Tarfileset has attributes to > apply a set of permissions to fileset. I wouldn't call this a transformation of the set, maybe this could be handled by a different concept or something similar. What I'm trying to stress is that (which could be a with a nested that adds permissions) still consists of existing files, while a set that has been transformed by a doesn't give the same guarantee - and it shouldn't. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: