Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 30611 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2002 02:33:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2002 02:33:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 13643 invoked by uid 97); 7 Feb 2002 02:34:05 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13600 invoked by uid 97); 7 Feb 2002 02:34:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13589 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2002 02:34:04 -0000 From: "Adam Murdoch" To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: RE: [AUDIT] jakarta-ant/proposal/myrmidon Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:32:13 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <035401c1af73$f0125e40$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephane Bailliez [mailto:sbailliez@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2002 11:08 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: [AUDIT] jakarta-ant/proposal/myrmidon > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Murdoch" > > [...] > > I don't think it's worth spending time on. Sounds like autofix > is the way > > Well I looked into it...and yes it's not worth it because it would require > quite some time :-) > > > to go - how about we just go with the rule as it currently > stands ("final > > static"), and autofix the fields with "static final"? > > eh ? not possible. The autofix will fix what the rule reported. > So for now I would say, autofix fields into final static or don't pay > attention to it or disable it. > Sorry, that's what I meant. As in, autofix the fields so that they all end up declared "final static". Adam -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: