Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-25104-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 30100 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2002 13:17:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2002 13:17:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 15854 invoked by uid 97); 10 Feb 2002 13:17:19 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15828 invoked by uid 97); 10 Feb 2002 13:17:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15809 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2002 13:17:17 -0000
Message-Id: <200202101317.g1ADHG805938@mail008.syd.optusnet.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
From: Peter Donald <peter@apache.org>
To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: TryCatchFinallyTask ?
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:13:47 +1100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
References: <200202100929.g1A9TuE01804@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au>
 <003201c1b226$09432020$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0>
In-Reply-To: <003201c1b226$09432020$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0>
X-Wisdom-Cookie: .
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 22:28, Stephane Bailliez wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Donald" <peter@apache.org>
>
> > I can't recall if this has been rejected before but I going to propose it
> > again ;)
>
> It is my understanding that no one ever wanted this (though I have no
> opinion but a need too and this has been a RFE from many users). I thought
> it was you that were originally -1 for this. :-)

I probably would have if it had been implemented as an antcall rather than as 
a container ;)

> is that the <tbody> that would be the <try-catch-finally> element ?

yep.

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

--------------------------------------------------
 Logic: The art of being wrong with confidence...
--------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>