Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-24395-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 50915 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2002 21:00:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2002 21:00:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 1163 invoked by uid 97); 2 Feb 2002 21:00:03 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 1147 invoked by uid 97); 2 Feb 2002 21:00:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 1133 invoked by uid 50); 2 Feb 2002 21:00:02 -0000
Date: 2 Feb 2002 21:00:02 -0000
Message-ID: <20020202210002.1132.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Cc: 
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2956]  -
    patch to junit and touch task: junit task now wont fail on non-junit test,
 touch now provides the same timestamp for all files when operating on a
 fileset
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2956

patch to junit and touch task: junit task now wont fail on non-junit test, touch now provides the same timestamp for all files when operating on a fileset

jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |



------- Additional Comments From jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com  2002-02-02 21:00 -------
It would be nice, however, if <junit> could just ignore non-
junit.framework.Test implementing classes rather than having to have an include 
patternset to pick and choose which classes to run.  I'm not sure about that 
particular patch though - but it would be something nice to have.  I'm going to 
mark the <junit> enhancement as LATER.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>