Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-ID: <011201c1b191$0d3f21a0$9545d6d1@compaq>
From: "Magesh Umasankar" <umagesh@apache.org>
To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202081046090.5098-100000@localhost.localdomain>
 <005101c1b0d5$fba56e10$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0>
 <3C646AB7.30001@cortexebusiness.com.au>
 <005a01c1b0ff$fd8f71b0$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0>
 <009501c1b10f$f5c2e1a0$9545d6d1@compaq>
 <00e501c1b173$5a742100$d1eefea9@homenkf0y0hwu0>
Subject: Re: Speaking of deprecation...
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:41:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

From: "Stephane Bailliez" <sbailliez@apache.org>

> Frankly, who would ever have the idea of 
> having a to turn on deprecation if there 
> is no message to say so.
> 
> That was my '-1'.
> 
> I don't see any mention about this summary, 
> I did not even think about expressing it 
> (don't ask me why), nor was it expressed 
> clearly anywhere.

Showing a message that this buildfile
contains deprecated features was proposed
and I seconded it and you rejected it.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=100704574205433&w=2

> 
> If that's what you had in mind and want 
> credits back for it, frankly, I don't care 
> much, I don't have any patent to defend 

That wasn't the point.  What I wanted to say 
was this had been rejected earlier - that is 
all.  

> Stephane
> 

Cheers,
Magesh


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>