Return-Path: 
 <ant-dev-return-25637-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 99305 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2002 08:49:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2002 08:49:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 19757 invoked by uid 97); 18 Feb 2002 08:49:18 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 19741 invoked by uid 97); 18 Feb 2002 08:49:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 19730 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2002 08:49:18 -0000
Message-ID: <005301c1b858$423de530$0100a8c0@jose>
From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <j_a_fernandez@yahoo.com>
To: "Ant Developers List" <ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
References: <67FE02381F67D3119F960008C7845A2C0927B92E@nt_syd_ex09.macbank>
Subject: Re: Multiple patternsets in a fileset
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:42:54 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

From: "Tim Vernum" <Tim.Vernum@macquarie.com>

> From: Bruce Atherton [mailto:bruce@callenish.com]
>=20
> > What I think you are really  saying is=20
> > that you WANT to be able to fold patterns together.=20
>=20
> What I read Conor to be saying was:
>=20
>  * There is at least one example of a buildfile that relies
>    on the current behaviour
>=20
>  * There is a "reasonable" (*) use case for the current
>    behaviour.
>=20
> Both of which suggest that any change is going to be a
> nightmare for backwards compatiblity.
>=20

Not if we do what we did for <ant> and inheritAll
or what we have done elsewere, we added a compatibility flag
defaulted to the old behaviour.

Jose Alberto



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>