Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 90184 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2002 14:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2002 14:39:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 27325 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jan 2002 14:39:50 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27290 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jan 2002 14:39:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27279 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2002 14:39:48 -0000 Message-ID: From: Christian.Nedregard@findexa.no To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: Ant2 VFS Proposal Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:39:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I know nothing about the problems with the way commons is run, but writing a VFS and making it Ant dependant seems neither to be very Component Oriented or eh.. 'nice'. Seems better to make it part of commons, or even a full fledged Jakarta project. Then wrappers could be made for Ant, Avalon etc. Christian > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Vernum [mailto:Tim.Vernum@macquarie.com] > Sent: 22. januar 2002 00:37 > To: 'Ant Developers List' > Subject: RE: Ant2 VFS Proposal > > > I know I'm about to open up a can of worms here... > > But this seems like a sure thing for commons. > > If the VFS really Ant specific? > Given that we (ie Magesh) spent time looking > for a usable implementation that we could steal, > wouldn't it make sense to have ours in a place > where it can be easily shared? > > I know that some people have objections to the > way commons is run (and I can appreciate them) > but I think it is at least worth having the > discussion. > > > > NOTICE > This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may > contain copyright material of Macquarie Bank or third > parties. If you are not the intended recipient of this email > you should not read, print, re-transmit, store or act in > reliance on this e-mail or any attachments, and should > destroy all copies of them. Macquarie Bank does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or any attached files. The views > or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not > reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie Bank. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: